How might we apply the trinitarian notion of ‘Person’ to mere humans?

The theological concept of ‘person’ and its complementary notion ‘nature’ were developed through early church teaching on the Holy Trinity Incarnation. Persons in this case referred solely to Father, Son Spirit while expressed unity Godhead encompassed those attributes which shared by divine Persons. later history theologically derived took a different turn, moving away from complementarity nature person order embrace human for seemed ill fitting. In new conception, was subsumed under category ‘nature’. A came refer full reality, body soul, more general notion, aimed at accommodating both personhood, as famously Boethius, thought an individual substance rational nature.
 One might ask, however, whether it is possible fruitful develop initial, direction, that is, so covers not only but also mere humans. Does give coherence area anthropology beyond afforded classical, nature-based ‘person’? Here I attempt set out conceptual framework application humans with controversies Church – or least according one reading process. first take note features personhood test persons be understood same similar terms, taking into account difference between creaturely existence. then draw comparisons traditional has been applied beings show former version preferred. conclude comments some implications person.